Content that could only come from you
Chomi is an AI SEO content generator that interviews the person who actually does the work, for about fifteen minutes, then writes the page from what they said. The result carries examples and opinions that exist nowhere else, which is what search engines and AI assistants now reward.
No card needed to start. Your trial is one allowance, not a monthly refill, so you can spend it at your own pace.
What does a client usually get wrong before they call you?
Written to be quoted where people
now ask their questions
Every page your site needs, from one conversation
Pick the kind of page first. The brief, the interview questions and the finished draft are all shaped for it.
Profile and documents
What the AI reads first
Brief for one page
Topics, not answers
Approved by a human
Or sent back
Voice interview
Four to eight questions
Finished page
Design-ready blocks
What an AI SEO content generator actually does
They write from a prompt
Fine when sameness does not cost you anything. A prompt-based writer works from what is already published, so you get a competent version of what everyone else has.
Or they score your draft
Genuinely useful for spotting what competitors have covered and you have not. It measures the page against the ones already ranking and tells you what to add.
Neither adds what was never written down
The starting point here is a spoken interview with the person who knows the subject, and the page is written from their answers rather than from a summary of the web.
This is the gap Chomi is built for
Too busy to write is not too busy to talk
Nobody has an afternoon spare to write a page. Everybody has fifteen minutes on the way somewhere. The interview is a conversation you can have on speaker, and the page is written from what you said.
Question 2 of 6
What do clients usually get wrong before they call you?
- Question 2 of 6. What do clients usually get wrong before they call you?
- You, answering. Talking, not typing. About fifteen minutes in total.
- Page written. From your answers, in blocks ready to publish.
- Your client approves. A link, your branding, no account needed.
AI content generation tools for marketing teams compared
Five ways a marketing team can produce content, and what each is best at. The difference that matters is where the words come from: a page built on what only your expert knows is one an AI assistant can quote and nobody else can copy.
| Chomi | ChatbotsChatGPT, Gemini | AI writing toolsJasper, Copy.ai | SEO toolsSurfer, Clearscope | A writerFreelance or agency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What you end up with | Expert-led content worth quoting, because nowhere else has it | A summary of what is already being quoted | Polished copy with nothing new to quote | A tidier version of what you already wrote | Worth quoting, if they dug deep enough |
| Where the words come from | A talk with your expert | What is already published | What is already published | What already ranks | The writer |
| What you give it | Fifteen minutes of talking | A prompt | A prompt and a tone setting | A draft to score | A brief |
| Says something only you know | Yes | No | No | No | Sometimes |
| Knows your business before it writes | Reads your profile and documents for context | Only what you paste in | Remembers your tone | Not its job | After a few months |
| Asks follow-up questions | Yes, when an answer is thin | Only if you prompt it to | No | No | A good one does |
| Your client can approve it | A link, no account needed | No | No | No | However you do it now |
| Best for | Pages that need real authority | Quick answers and research | Volume | Finding what you missed | Delicate or sensitive work |
Scroll the table sideways to compare
The honest limit: if nobody will spend fifteen minutes talking, Chomi is no better than the rest, and we would rather say that here than after you have paid. Volume work does not need an interview either. Fifty product descriptions are a job for a writing tool.
Why AI content stops ranking
How visible a page stays, month by month
It is not the AI
Google does not penalise content for being written with AI. It pushes down content that says what everyone else already says, whoever or whatever wrote it. Those are different problems with different fixes.
Hiding it does not help
Once you believe the first one, you go looking for ways to hide that AI was involved, or you rewrite the same commodity article by hand. Neither changes the reason the page is invisible.
Nor do better prompts
A model can only work with what it already holds, and what it already holds is everything that has been published. The missing ingredient is the thing your expert knows and has never typed out.
Six stages, and a human approves the final draft
Your part is the profile at the start, picking who answers, and about fifteen minutes of talking in the middle.
Stage 1Profile
Build the business profile and knowledge base
You fill in how the business works and upload documents. The AI reads all of it before it writes a word, which is what keeps invented detail out of the brief.
Services and audienceTone of voiceWhat makes them differentThree documents uploaded- How the business works
- Documents you upload
- Read before anything is written
Stage 2Brief
Generate the brief for one specific page
Page type, the audience's awareness stage, the purpose and call to action, plus the keywords and the prompts people type into AI assistants. The brief names topics to cover rather than supplying answers, and it is tailored to whoever will be answering the questions.
Brief: service pageH2H2H3FAQ- Awareness stage and purpose
- Keywords and AI prompts
- Topics to cover, not answers
Stage 3Approval
Approve, edit or reject the brief
Approve it, change it, or send it back. Clients do this through a share link without creating an account. Nothing gets written until someone signs it off.
Waiting on approval
Shared with the client. No account needed.
ApproveSend back- Approve, change or send back
- Share link, no account
- Nothing is written until it is signed off
Stage 4Expert
Pick who answers
Add your experts once, with their role and what each of them knows: your own team, or your client's staff. Then put each interview to whoever actually knows that subject. Your own people can have a login that shows them their questions and nothing else, and a client's experts answer through a link.
Head of operationsYour team, with a loginLead technicianKnows this subjectInterview sentClient's sales directorAnswers through a link- Your team or your client's staff
- The right person for each subject
- A link, no account for clients
Stage 5Interview
Run the voice interview
The platform asks the questions, not a person. It stays anchored to the brief, and it follows up when an answer is thin or unclear. If a question sits outside the interviewee's expertise, the interview can be sent on to someone who can answer it.
Question 3 of 6Following up: can you give me an example?
- The platform asks, not a person
- Follow-ups where an answer is thin
- Hand it on to whoever can answer
Stage 6Content
Approve the final draft
The draft arrives as design-ready blocks written from the brief plus the interview, with keyword use kept inside a budget and the usual AI tells stripped out. A strength score checks it against best search practice, in three parts: what makes it yours, whether it can be found and quoted, and whether it reads like a person, and says what to improve in each. Then a person approves the final draft, through the same link as the brief.
Draft readyAnswer boxTableFAQWhat makes it yoursFound and quotedReads like a personTo improve: put a direct answer in the first hundred words
- Design-ready blocks
- A strength score, and what to improve
- A person approves the final draft
The follow-up is where the method works or does not
The specific example usually arrives on the third push, after someone has run out of the things they tell everyone. If nobody will sit for that, the output is no better than any other tool, and we would rather say so now than after you have paid.
Interview in progress
What makes your process different from other agencies?
We're thorough, and we really take the time to understand the client.
Anyone could have said this
Can you give me a specific example from the last few months?
We stopped taking briefs over email. Last quarter a client signed off a spec, then changed it twice in a thread nobody was reading. Now every brief gets a fifteen minute call and a written summary back the same day.
This is what reaches the page
Who this suits, and who it does not
Stated plainly so you can rule yourself out before you pay for anything.
Get value from this
- Agencies of one to about twenty people who chase clients for information they never send
- Freelancers and solo marketers selling their own expertise
- In-house teams whose specialists know things that were never written down
- Owner-run businesses writing their own pages
Look elsewhere
- Anyone who wants volume published automatically, with no interview and no review
- Anyone who needs social posts, ad copy, video scripts or images. This makes web pages and articles
- Businesses with nothing distinctive to say yet. The honest first step there is working out the offer
- Anyone unwilling to give fifteen minutes of a real expert's time
For agencies holding several clients in one login
The client should be reviewing your work, not discovering a tool and asking what they are paying you for.
Northgate Plumbing
Trades
- NPInterview booked
Northgate Plumbing
12 documents in its knowledge base
- VLBrief awaiting approval
Verity Legal
31 documents in its knowledge base
- HDDraft ready to review
Harbour Dental
8 documents in its knowledge base
- FLInterview booked
Fielder Logistics
19 documents in its knowledge base
Each client keeps its own profile, documents and approvals.
Several clients in one login
Agency plans hold several client businesses in one login, with a separate knowledge base for each client.
Approval without an account
Client-facing share links. They approve or edit the brief and the finished piece without creating an account.
Your logo on what they see
Logo and color customization on the top agency tier, so the client is reviewing your work rather than discovering a tool.
More volume, not more features
Functionality is identical across tiers. Higher tiers add volume and branding, and top-up credits cover a month that runs long.
How the subscription works
A monthly subscription, no setup fee, no per-piece invoicing. Two things drive the price: how much you publish each month in briefs, interviews and finished pieces, and how many separate client businesses you hold in the workspace. The functionality does not change as you move up. You get more of it.
Freelance
$55 / month
Billed monthly, cancel any time
Start freeor subscribe now- Client businesses
- 3
- Content pieces a month
- 15
- Briefs a month
- 15
- Expert interviews a month
- 15
- Rewrites included
- 1 per piece
- Extra rewrites a month
- 8
- Max rewrites on one piece
- 3
- Knowledge base documents
- 10 per client
- Client approval links
- Every page type
- Top-up credits
- White-label client links
- AI assistant (MCP)
Agency
Most picked$149 / month
Billed monthly, cancel any time
Start freeor subscribe now- Client businesses
- 8
- Content pieces a month
- 48
- Briefs a month
- 48
- Expert interviews a month
- 48
- Rewrites included
- 1 per piece
- Extra rewrites a month
- 24
- Max rewrites on one piece
- 4
- Knowledge base documents
- 15 per client
- Client approval links
- Every page type
- Top-up credits
- White-label client links
- AI assistant (MCP)
Agency Scale
$329 / month
Billed monthly, cancel any time
Start freeor subscribe now- Client businesses
- 20
- Content pieces a month
- 120
- Briefs a month
- 120
- Expert interviews a month
- 120
- Rewrites included
- 1 per piece
- Extra rewrites a month
- 60
- Max rewrites on one piece
- 5
- Knowledge base documents
- 20 per client
- Client approval links
- Every page type
- Top-up credits
- White-label client links
- AI assistant (MCP)
Top-up credits cover a month that runs long, so a busy month does not force an upgrade. Yearly payment is available at a discount.
Compare every plan line by line
Need more than this?
More clients, more pieces, or a volume that does not sit on the ladder. Tell us what you publish in a month and we will build a plan around it.
FAQs
About fifteen minutes of talking. It is four to eight questions by voice, with follow-ups where an answer needs more, so it runs longer only when the platform has found something worth pushing on. That is the whole ask of the busy person.
Yes, and usually they should. The brief is tailored to whoever is answering, so a founder gets different questions from a specialist further down the business. If a question lands with the wrong person, the interview can be sent on to someone who can answer it.
The difference is the input, not the model. Prompt a general writing tool and it works from what is already published, so you get a competent version of what everyone else has. Here the page is written from a recorded interview with your expert, including the bits that only came out after the second follow-up question. No prompt can retrieve information that has never been written down.
You do. The answers are your expert's words and the finished page is yours to edit and publish.
Yes, on the top agency package. Brief approvals and finished pieces reach your client through a share link carrying your logo and colors, and they do not need an account to use it. That matters because the client should be reviewing your work, not discovering a tool and asking what they are paying you for.
Start with your next page
Do not take the argument on faith. Pick one page you already owe someone, fill in the profile, run the interview, and read what comes back. Then choose the plan that matches how much you publish and how many clients you hold.